Thanks for the explanation, I understand your point. I still think the "oldest server" option could be useful in certain situations, even if it's not always accurate.
Instead of scanning all servers every 30 minutes, maybe there's a simpler alternative like estimating server age based on Job ID patterns (if they follow any), or just sorting the visible servers by player count or activity. It wouldn't be perfect, but it could still help users looking for servers that are likely to be older — for example, to find servers where certain events have already started, avoid fresh servers in some games, or just reduce lag spikes from newly spawned ones.Just a thought in case you ever want to implement a lighter version of that feature!
Thanks for the explanation, I understand your point. I still think the "oldest server" option could be useful in certain situations, even if it's not always accurate.
Instead of scanning all servers every 30 minutes, maybe there's a simpler alternative like estimating server age based on Job ID patterns (if they follow any), or just sorting the visible servers by player count or activity. It wouldn't be perfect, but it could still help users looking for servers that are likely to be older — for example, to find servers where certain events have already started, avoid fresh servers in some games, or just reduce lag spikes from newly spawned ones.Just a thought in case you ever want to implement a lighter version of that feature!